I'm afraid I'll create Skynet…
Software
Third party video for Apple TV is a no brainer
Aug 31st
Including access to Netflix on the rumored iTV seems like a no-brainer at first — every set-top box worth its salt has it. It’d be suicide not to, right? But then you start thinking about how Apple would probably like nothing more than to launch a full-scale competitor to Netflix in the form of 99¢ rentals.
Let’s think about it this way. The Apple TV has failed to sell in large numbers. What is, more or less, the only way to get media on an Apple TV? The iTunes Store. So it seems logical to me that keeping that status quo won’t do anything to change Apple TV sales. $0.99 TV show rentals? Honestly I’m surprised they aren’t already that price. The Apple TV (or iTV or whatever) needs to open up to developers in a similar way that the iOS did.
There should be zero concerns that allowing other apps will take away from Apple’s video business. The only way to sell a lot of video, is to have a lot of devices out there for watching video. As I said before, the Apple TV hasn’t sold well with just iTunes content. But you better believe a device that allows Netflix, Boxee, Hulu, and any other kind of internet video service to build their own app will sell much better. And then there’s always the possibility of in app purchases of which Apple could take a cut. I’m not going to speculate on games and other things because we simply don’t know what interaction with the rumored device will be like.
Think about it simply. Would Apple rather have a device that sells poorly through which you can only purchase and watch video directly from Apple. Or a device that sells incredibly well that allows you to watch video from other sources. I’d bet you anything that not only would they make a TON of money from increased hardware sales, but they would sell just as much volume of their own content based on the sheer number of customers with an Apple TV in their living room.
PS: Lets be clear, whatever OS is on a new Apple TV may be “iOS-based” but it won’t look a whole lot like the iOS. This will not be a touch based interface, which COMPLETELY changes the way you interact with it. I can’t see any way you could elegantly just scale iOS apps onto a TV screen. This will be a completely separate store.
Socialscope prepping betas across the smartphone spectrum
Aug 31st
Socialscope, who has had a social app for Blackberry in private beta for….a really long time, is now prepping versions for iPhone, Android, WebOS, and Windows Phone 7. Users can now sign up at their website to get invitations for the platform of their choice.
I’ve been using the Blackberry beta for a while, and it is by far the best Twitter app out there. In addition to Twitter, you can add your Facebook, Foursquare and Flickr accounts for maximum sharing. My favorite part of the app is the unified stream view. It shows you entries from all of your social feeds combined into one view. There are also unified views for replies and messages.
Along the top of the screen, a bar allows you to choose between those unified views and each individual feed. You can also add tabs for Twitter lists and Socialscope groups, which allow you to group friends across different services.
It will be interesting to see what the guys at Socialscope can bring to the table on touch based devices. They’ve created the most crucial app on my Blackberry, but the competition there is so lackluster. Ubertwitter is their best competition, and that’s just not saying much. Android has some solid apps in Seesmic and Twitter for Android, but nothing amazing. The competition on iPhone is fierce, but I love Socialscope’s flow so hopefully they can create an app as strong as the Blackberry version.
There’s no word on when invites for the new platforms will be sent out.
Samsung releases teaser video of Galaxy Tab
Aug 24th
Samsung today posted a teaser site and video (below) for the Galaxy Tab. The clip doesn’t provide more than was already known but confirms the front camera for “video calling,” 720p playback and Android 2.2 out of the box. Other brief teases clearly show the Swype keyboard as well as make references to e-reading and GPS mapping.
A formal launch is now penned in for September 2, just ahead of the IFA show in Berlin.
The device is now expected to have a seven-inch, 1024×600 display, carry both front and back cameras, and hold 16GB of internal storage.
via Samsung teases Galaxy Tab for US launch | Electronista.
I’m really excited to see this thing and I’m glad they are putting the latest OS in it (take notes Dell). I’m not ready to say that it’s going to be a bonafide iPad competitor yet, but the Galaxy S reviews have been good so hopefully the Galaxy Tab will be equally solid.
The 7-inch screen size really intrigues me. My iPad certainly isn’t too big, but sometimes it does feel a little bit large and weighty. A more moderately sized tablet might hit the perfect sweet spot between screen size and weight in your hands.
A hodge-podge of thoughts on Google, and the death of the best Android phone
Jul 25th
I’ve been wanting to post some thoughts on where I think Google should take the Nexus One strategy in the future. But then this past week they surprised me by announcing that they will no longer be selling the device through it’s online store.
The gave customers the true Android experience. It was clear of carrier and manufacturer crapware and waste. It could be bought unlocked or on contract with T-Mobile. Google took little risk in selling the phone online and they put no money into advertising. It’s obvious it was an experiment. An attempt to break the carriers control over the phones on their network. The only carrier they could get to go for it was T-Mobile who seems to be willing to do anything to increase subscribers. So when, unsurprisingly, users did
Why wasn’t the Nexus One ever brought to Verizon?? I’d be willing to bet it had a lot to do with Verizon’s desire to have more control over their devices. They didn’t want these Nexus One users having free WiFi hotspot access among other things. And Google probably wasn’t willing to concede that. They wanted their device to be the full unencumbered Android experience.
The only other device I’ve seen in the past year that was similar was the original Motorola Droid. Given that, I was hoping that the next iteration of the Droid might take the Nexus One’s places as Google’s flagship phone. Unfortunately, it seems that both the Droid X and the upcoming Droid 2 will be running some variation of Motorola’s Blur interface. The Droid has yet to receive the official Froyo update, and I would be willing to bet the this WiFi hotspot feature is a holdup. Verizon is NOT going to let a phone do that without being able to make some money off of it.
So why does it matter? Well Android 2.2 has been released for several weeks now, but the Nexus One is still the only one with Froyo available for installation (unless of course you root and install ROMs, which is not for the average customer). It really highlights the problem with Android, Google is at the mercy of manufacturers and carriers. They hoped they could use the Nexus One to push the carriers and take a little control, but they put so little effort into it that there was no way it could possibly succeed.
What should they have done?
- Certainly they shouldn’t have abandoned the Nexus One idea. Instead, they should have actually committed to it and showed that it was important to have an official Google phone with the latest software. They should have marketed the device properly. More than just a small bit on the bottom of Google.com and some ads in airports. Show me some commercials, print ads, etc. really highlighting the strengths of Android (maybe they struggled to find those…).
- Figure out your network strategy. Keep it as a GSM phone for AT&T and T-Mobile or build a CDMA one for Verizon or Sprint. Work with those carriers to make it happen but keep the crap out. You will probably have to abandon the free hotspot tethering idea, but that’s fine.
- I’m not really sure Android is ready for this, but BUILD AN IPOD TOUCH COMPETITOR. The music app is still lacking, but I think you have to give this a try. Unlike Apple, you’re into expandable storage, so you can sell devices with a couple gigs of memory and offer the ability to expand with SD cards. I’d also suggest making both 3G and WiFi models. There’s no denying we’re moving to the cloud, and making a 3G device with an iPad-esque plan would give customers anytime access to Pandora, Rdio, Rhapsody, and possibly Google Music in the future?
- Work with a retail store to give customers hands on access to these devices. You don’t have to have your own store to let buyers play with them. Best Buy, Radioshack, and Wal-Mart would all be great places to give users an opportunity to see what the Android experience is about.
Tom Reestman made a great point about why Google handled the situation the way they did saying
I wish Google had done a Nexus Two, but I understand why they did not. Google’s interest in Android is to get it in as many hands as possible and sell ads. In Google’s eyes, a Nexus Two would provide no advantages to them or their ad buyers over any other new Android phone. The fragmentation of varying UIs, services, and other add-ons doesn’t need to concern them. Sheer volume and ads, that’s their business model. I’m not knocking the model (it’s very successful), but it’s in keeping with it that they not waste resources on another Nexus.
Sadly I think that may be the case, and why Apple devices will always be better than Android phones. Apple makes money buy building products that consumers love. They want you to love using your phone and to pay them a bunch of money for it. Google, on the other hand, makes money by giving advertisers eyeballs. They only care about Android in so far as customers are looking at ads. That’s more or less the only source of profit for them.
I hope Google makes more of an effort to build something that will let consumers see the joy the using an Android device can bring. A device that will give developers comfort that more users will have the latest version of the OS. However Google tends to think a little bit too much about hard data and I’m not convinced they see the benefit such a device (or line of devices) would bring to the Android ecosystem.
Super Mario Live Wallpaper for Android
Jun 29th
A [particularly awesome] developer has created a Live Wallpaper for Android that shows Mario navigating through various dynamically created levels. The wallpaper has a complex AI that controls Mario but uses considerable amounts of battery (which I’d say is totally worth it).
Obviously it requires an Android phone that supports Live Wallpapers (which I believe is any phone w/ 2.1 and above?)
Nonsense
May 10th
Some silly analyst claims that Apple may have extended their exclusivity with AT&T 6 months in order to get great deals on iPad data rates. Specifically the idea seems to be that Apple would have delayed a Verizon iPhone from this summer to get AT&T to make that deal.
Really? Apple had an iPhone ready to launch for Verizon’s stellar network and tens of millions of subscribers who want an iPhone, but decided to hold off 6 months or more just so their customers could save some money on those 3G iPad plans? The huge margins they’d make on each phone, as well as the tremendously increased market share and improved network service they would get with Verizon, were worth sacrificing to make a few extra bucks selling 3G iPad’s instead those without?
Yeah. Nonsense.
At best, the closest this claim is to accurate is Apple said, “Hey we’ll give you exclusive rights to the iPad for a while, if you’ll give us a great deal on service.” And AT&T jumped at the chance because they’re desperate to please the company who makes them a lot of money.
But Apple sitting on a product that would bring them so much profit (and so many App store eyeballs), just for a good deal on 3G data service. Why do we listen to “analysts”??
Daring Fireball Linked List: Darby Lines on the Tech Media's Obsession With 'X Is a Y-Killer' Storylines
Dec 15th
Any story that talks about some new phone being an “iPhone killer” is almost certainly a story you don’t need to read.
So remarkably true. The “iPhone killer” simply does not and will not exist. It’s hyperbole that is meant to do nothing but draw readers in; which can be OK, but definitely is not when it has no substance.
Nothing will kill the iPhone. It will be the dominant phone for many years to come. It will never be killed like Windows will never be killed. The only thing that will bring it down is the distant future when Apple moves on to something else.
Posted via web from Chris Brakebill’s Posterousness






















